Van der Waals free energy model for solubilization of oil in micelles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work introduces the first of a two part thermodynamic framework to estimate the solubilization of nonpolar oils in micelles conformed by nonionic surfactants with linear alkyl tails, considering their configuration and the molecular properties of the constituents. This first part introduces a formal approach to account for the lipophilic (van der Waals) contributions to the free energy of solubilization in spherical micelles. To this end, this work uses two recently developed integration methods for sphere-shell and cone-shell VDW interactions that allow the calculation of surfactant-oil and surfactant-surfactant interactions that take place within the micelles of the solubilization process studied here. The method consists in calculating the free energy of transferring a normal alkane from its continuum, and surfactants monomers from empty micelles to produce an oil swollen micelle. The lipophilic interactions are estimated using the microscopic approach of Hamaker with Lifshitz-based Hamaker constants. The influence of n-alkane and surfactant tail length on the solubilization capacity predicted by the van der Walls free energy model (VDW-FEM) are consistent with experimental trends and it is also consistent with the lipophilic terms included in the semi-empirical Hydrophilic-Lipophilic-Difference + Net-Average-Curvature's (HLD-NAC) equation that predicts the phase behavior of microemulsions. As a result, these lipophilic terms can now be defined in terms of molecular interactions and molecular properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".