Downlink beamforming through relays: imperfect CSI and coordinated transmission
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Future wireless systems face challenges in supporting high-rate multimedia streaming with wide coverage area and at low power. Cooperative relaying is investigated in the following context: a single base station with multiple antennas simultaneously transmits different data streams to single-antenna destinations through a set of single-antenna fixed relays, with no direct link transmission between base stations and destinations. Transmission is via space-division multiple access with per-user quality-of-service constraints. The base station performs transmit beamforming (precoding) and relays cooperatively perform distributed beamforming. To address minimum-power source precoding and relay beamforming, the source precoder design with a fixed relay beamformer is first considered. Precoding is also generalized to multiple cooperating base stations. Next, the relay beamformer is optimized for a given source precoder and the process is iterated. The formulation is generalized to account for CSI estimates obtained from pilot symbol training. Simulation results quantify tradeoffs, including numbers of base station antennas and relays, effect of CSI quality on performance, as well as the impact of cooperating base stations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".