MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972008450 · doi:10.1115/1.4027413

Localized Vibration of a Microtubule Surrounded by Randomly Distributed Cross Linkers

2014· article· en· W1972008450 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Z. Jin, C. Q. Ru

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomechanical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Innovates
KeywordsVibrationMicrotubuleFoundation (evidence)PhysicsNormal modeWork (physics)Transverse planeMechanicsAcousticsStructural engineeringQuantum mechanicsBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on finite element simulation, the present work studies free vibration of a microtubule surrounded by 3D randomly distributed cross linkers in living cells. A basic result of the present work is that transverse vibration modes associated with the lowest frequencies are highly localized, in sharp contrast to the through-length modes predicted by the commonly used classic elastic foundation model. Our simulations show that the deflected length of localized modes increases with increasing frequency and approaches the entire length of microtubule when frequency approaches the minimum classic frequency given by the elastic foundation model. In particular, unlike the length-sensitive classic frequencies predicted by the elastic foundation model, the lowest frequencies of localized modes predicted by the present model are insensitive to the length of microtubules and are at least 50% lower than the minimum classic frequency for infinitely long microtubules and could be one order of magnitude lower than the minimum classic frequency for shorter microtubules (only a few microns in length). These results suggest that the existing elastic foundation model may have overestimated the lowest frequencies of microtubules in vivo. Finally, based on our simulation results, some empirical relations are proposed for the critical (lowest) frequency of localized modes and the associated wave length. Compared to the classic elastic foundation model, the localized vibration modes and the associated wave lengths predicted by the present model are in better agreement with some known experimental observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomechanical EngineeringSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207