MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972022901 · doi:10.1504/ijrm.2009.024160

Optimal pricing and inventory decisions when individual customer preferences are explicitly modelled

2009· article· en· W1972022901 on OpenAlex
John G. Wilson, Craig Sorochuk

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Revenue Management · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevenue managementInventory managementEconomicsBusinessOperations researchMarketingMicroeconomicsOperations managementRevenueMathematicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We approach the newsvendor with pricing problem as a practitioner who must model demand as a function of price. Previous work required strong assumptions about demand curves, making practical implementation of results problematical. Instead, we assume that customers have reservation prices which can be determined through standard marketing/statistical techniques. We then derive a demand curve and investigate the ramifications for setting the optimal price and quantity. We demonstrate that a practitioner often need only estimate some intuitive quantities of the possible consumers. Using our approach, it is possible to infer what assumptions impose on a model of individual consumer behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it