MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972074830 · doi:10.3103/s0967091214120067

Structure, phase composition, and defect substructure of differentially quenched rail

2014· article· en· W1972074830 on OpenAlexaff
В. Е. Громов, A. B. Yur’ev, К. В. Морозов, Yu. F. Ivanov, К. В. Алсараева

Bibliographic record

VenueSteel in Translation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsEVRAZ (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstructurePearliteMaterials scienceQuenching (fluorescence)Ferrite (magnet)Transmission electron microscopyCarbideComposite materialMicrostructurePhase (matter)MetallurgyAusteniteStructural engineeringChemistryOpticsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differential quenching of rail by compressed air is a promising hardening method. Transmission electron microscopy is used for layer-by-layer analysis of differentially quenched rail. Quantitative parameters of the structure, phase composition, and dislocational substructure are determined and compared for different quenching conditions. Differential quenching of rail by compressed air in different conditions is accompanied by diffusional γ → α transformation. Three morphologically distinct components are formed: grains of plate pearlite, structure-free ferrite, and ferrite-carbide mixture. Gradient behavior is noted in the resulting structure: the state of the surface layer in the rail steel depends not only on the quenching conditions but also on the direction of observation and the depth of the layer being analyzed. Dislocational substructure is obtained; not only dislocational chaos, but also reticular, cellular, and fragmented dislocational substructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSteel in TranslationSame topicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsFrench-language works237,207