MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972123402 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564859

On the estimation of pitch of noisy speech based on time and frequency domain representations

2008· article· en· W1972123402 on OpenAlex
Celia Shahnaz, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPitch detection algorithmFrequency domainComputer scienceHarmonicSpeech recognitionRepresentation (politics)Noise (video)Time domainHarmonic analysisFourier transformDomain (mathematical analysis)AlgorithmSpectral density estimationSIGNAL (programming language)Time–frequency analysisSpeech enhancementFundamental frequencySpeech processingMathematicsAcousticsArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for pitch estimation from speech signals heavily degraded by additive noise based on both time and frequency domain representations. A least-squares minimization technique is first developed for the accurate estimation of a pitch-harmonic (PH) wherein a harmonic sinusoidal model of clean speech is exploited as a time domain representation. Then, relying on a power spectrum in the Fast Fourier Transform domain which is a frequency domain representation, a two-step criterion is formulated in order to acquire a true harmonic number corresponding to the extracted PH for robust pitch detection. Extensive simulations have been carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology as compared to some of the existing techniques in literature. It has been shown that our new approach consistently outperforms the other methods especially at low levels of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it