MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972123852 · doi:10.4018/ijsss.2011010105

Research Commentaries on Cangelosi’s “Solutions and Open Challenges for the Symbol Grounding Problem”

2011· article· en· W1972123852 on OpenAlexaff
Stevan Harnad, Luc Steels, Tony Belpaeme, Carol J. Madden, Stéphane Lallée, Peter Ford Dominey, Stephen J. Cowley, Juyang Weng, Alberto Greco, Barbara Giolito, Domenico Parisi, Vincent C. Müller, Ângelo Loula, João Queiroz, Ricardo Gudwin, Angelo Cangelosi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage and cultural evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsSymbol (formal)GroundComputer scienceOpen researchEngineeringElectrical engineeringWorld Wide WebProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Request access from your librarian to read this article's full text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.115
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.115
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0170.019
Scholarly communication0.0130.019
Open science0.0050.009
Research integrity0.0340.041
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.450
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.006 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Signs and Semiotic SystemsSame topicLanguage and cultural evolutionFrench-language works237,207