MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972129646 · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/55/1/015005

Asymmetric toroidal flux generation due to phase locking of internally resonant tearing modes in the RELAX reversed-field pinch

2012· article· en· W1972129646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamoPhysicsToroidReversed field pinchSolar dynamoPinchToroidal and poloidalMagnetic fluxMagnetohydrodynamicsTearingAsymmetryInstabilityMechanicsExcitationMagnetic fieldPosition (finance)Phase (matter)Flux (metallurgy)PlasmaDynamo theoryQuantum mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-generation and sustainment of toroidal flux via a dynamo is one of the unique characteristics of the reversed-field pinch (RFP) configuration. In a small aspect ratio RFP machine RELAX, it has been observed that a sudden dynamo usually occurs at a localized toroidal location. This localized dynamo evolves in time, causing a toroidally asymmetric flux distribution. The degree of asymmetry depends on the location and propagation of the localized dynamo. It has been observed that the position where the localized dynamo occurs coincides with the position where the phases of the internally resonant tearing modes align. The phase alignment plays an important role in triggering a localized dynamo activity and in the formation of asymmetric toroidal flux distribution especially in deep-reversal plasmas in RELAX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it