MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972129646 · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/55/1/015005

Asymmetric toroidal flux generation due to phase locking of internally resonant tearing modes in the RELAX reversed-field pinch

2012· article· en· W1972129646 on OpenAlexaff
R. Ikezoe, S. Masamune, K. Oki, Akio Sanpei, H. Himura, T. Onchi, Akira Hirose

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamoPhysicsToroidReversed field pinchSolar dynamoPinchToroidal and poloidalMagnetic fluxMagnetohydrodynamicsTearingAsymmetryInstabilityMechanicsExcitationMagnetic fieldPosition (finance)Phase (matter)Flux (metallurgy)PlasmaDynamo theoryQuantum mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-generation and sustainment of toroidal flux via a dynamo is one of the unique characteristics of the reversed-field pinch (RFP) configuration. In a small aspect ratio RFP machine RELAX, it has been observed that a sudden dynamo usually occurs at a localized toroidal location. This localized dynamo evolves in time, causing a toroidally asymmetric flux distribution. The degree of asymmetry depends on the location and propagation of the localized dynamo. It has been observed that the position where the localized dynamo occurs coincides with the position where the phases of the internally resonant tearing modes align. The phase alignment plays an important role in triggering a localized dynamo activity and in the formation of asymmetric toroidal flux distribution especially in deep-reversal plasmas in RELAX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlasma Physics and Controlled FusionSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207