MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972175900 · doi:10.1159/000235083

Interactions of Hemopoietic Cytokines on Differentiation of HL-60 Cells

2009· article· en· W1972175900 on OpenAlexafffund
Takashi Tsuda, Jan Switzer, John Bienenstock, Judah A. Denburg

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsBasophilNerve growth factorBiologyMast cellImmunologyHaematopoiesisInterleukin 3Cellular differentiationAllergic inflammationStem cell factorGranulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factorEosinophilMyeloidCytokineHistamineMyelopoiesisCell biologyInflammationEndocrinologyStem cellT cellImmunoglobulin EAntigen-presenting cellImmune systemAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a neurotropic polypeptide which has broad biological activity other than support of growth and survival of sympathetic, sensory and central neurons. NGF promotes rat mast cell hyperplasia in vivo and human granulopoiesis in vitro, selectively augmenting basophil/mast cell differentiation in the presence of T cells or conditioned medium derived from a human T cell line (Mo-CM), a source of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). NGF also synergizes with GM-CSF to promote human basophil/mast cell differentiation in both methylcellulose and suspension cultures of myeloid progenitors. In the current studies, we examined the interactions of NGF and several cytokines considered to be involved in human basophil/mast cell and eosinophil growth and differentiation, including interleukin (IL)-3, IL-4, IL-5, GM-CSF and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). NGF synergistically enhanced IL-5 induced dose-dependent increases in histamine content and basophilic cell differentiation of myeloid leukemic HL-60 cells, but was only additive to similar effects of IL-3. In contrast, IL-4 and G-CSF did not promote basophilic differentiation of HL-60 cells in the presence or absence of NGF. Various combinations of GM-CSF, G-CSF, IL-3, IL-4 and IL-5 could not reproduce the synergy observed between NGF and either IL-5 or GM-CSF. NGF appears to represent a class of lineage-specific co-factors, in this case being involved in GM-CSF- or IL-5-induced basophilic lineage differentiation, thus contributing to tissue inflammation or repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied ImmunologySame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207