MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972181475 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v8n1p97

Global Supply Chain Management Strategies of Born-Global Firms in the Fashion Industry: A Conceptual Model

2014· article· en· W1972181475 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sam C. Okoroafo, Bashar S. Gammoh, Anthony C. Koh, Melvin H. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Business and FDI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipBusinessSupply chainConceptual modelSupply chain managementProduct lifecycleProduct (mathematics)MarketingIndustrial organizationConceptual frameworkSample (material)Production (economics)New product developmentEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study examines the influence of trust, culture, and Web-enabled information technology on global supply chain management strategies of born global firms in the fashion industry. The paper seeks to provide insights into the success (or otherwise) of such entrepreneurial firms as they manage their business network alliances in the design, production, delivery and marketing of a fashion product…a product that is characterized by a very short fad/fashion product life cycle. The authors develop a conceptual model that links partnership formation, contracting processes, and global supply chain management strategies to the firm’s performance. Future research efforts need to empirically investigate the conceptual model on a sample of born global firms in the fashion industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicInternational Business and FDIFrench-language works237,207