MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972196336 · doi:10.3828/comma.2006.1-2.6

France et Nouvelle France : une expérience originale, le portail <u>www.archivescanadafrance.org</u>

2006· article· fr· W1972196336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComma · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concu dans le cadre des commemorations Canada-France 2004, le portail www.archivescanadafrance.org est le fruit d'une collaboration exemplaire entre des equipes de specialistes francais et canadiens, qui a pour ambition d'offrir au grand public, comme aux chercheurs, les sources d'archives numerisees concernant l'histoire de la France au Canada. Grâce a des technologies de pointe, le portail propose une base de donnees de pres d'un million d'images, tandis qu'une exposition virtuelle retrace l'histoire de l'etablissement et du maintien de la colonie francaise au Canada. Des produits pedagogiques et genealogiques devraient completer le portail et attirer des publics specifiques, tandis que l'integration dans la base de donnees d'images numerisees se poursuivra grâce a de nouveaux partenariats. Entre dans sa deuxieme phase en fevrier 2005, le portail www.archivescanadafrance.org represente un remarquable effort professionnel pour mettre au point des reponses scientifiques et technologiques a la question des memoires partagees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it