MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972211595 · doi:10.1063/1.2227482

Improved stability of the induced second-order nonlinearity in soft glass by thermal poling

2006· article· en· W1972211595 on OpenAlexaff
André L. Moura, M. T. de Araújo, M. V. D. Vermelho, J. Stewart Aitchison

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsPolingElectric fieldMaterials scienceNonlinear systemDipoleThermal stabilityElectric currentThermalMechanicsOptoelectronicsChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stable and intense second-order nonlinearity in soda lime glass is investigated tailoring the induced electric current. This procedure allows the determination of the relative contributions of the dipole orientation as well as the ionic contributions to the poling process. The experiments are developed in the light of multiple-carrier models controlling the output power supply applied current to tailor the frozen-in induced electric field — Edc. This method permits the induction of the stable nonlinearity for applied electric fields above ∼5kV∕cm and temperatures ∼250°C. It is also possible to reach higher temperatures than the ones used in normal poling procedures avoiding the electric current breakdown. The controlled Edc formation enables it to participate in essential chemical reactions that determine the intensity and stability of the nonlinearity. The induced d33 of ∼0.41pm∕V measured 20 days after poling reduced only ∼50% during the next seven months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207