EXPERIENCE OF TEENAGERS BORN WITH CLEFT LIP AND/OR PALATE AND INTERVENTIONS OF THE HEALTH NURSE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to describe and understand the experiences of teenagers with cleft lip and/or palate. The human ecology approach of Bronfenbrenner (1979) was chosen as a basis for this study. From this perspective, the living environment of teenagers with cleft lip and/or palate was considered, and as such, qualitative research from an ethnographic standpoint was conducted. The data were collected by semistructured interviews and recorded on magnetic tape. Ten teenagers, between 15 and 17 years of age, were chosen and consulted while undergoing therapeutic treatment and surgery in a cleft lip and/or palate clinic. The results of this study indicate that teenagers born with this congenital malformation experience various physical, functional, or interactional problems throughout their development. To improve this situation, nursing care has been developed to enable the nurse to act within the multidisciplinary team treating cleft lip and/or palate cases, thereby allowing the teenager to develop in an environment that offers a better quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".