MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1972222750 · doi:10.7202/056954ar

Le projet sportif des organismes franco-ontariens et leurs revendications auprès du gouvernement provincial

2005· article· fr· W1972222750 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Christine Dallaire

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'auteure fait l'hypothèse que le projet sportif franco-ontarien reflète le projet de société de la minorité francophone de l'Ontario puisqu'il s'inscrit dans le cadre du développement d'un réseau institutionnel au sein de la communauté, et qu'il offre des moyens d'accroître les possibilités d'interagir en français, entre francophones. Les organismes franco-ontariens qui interviennent dans le champ des activités physiques et sportives reprennent en plus le thème de l'autogestion; ils affirment que le développement de ce champ passe par sa prise en charge par les francophones. Dans cette quête d'autonomie, ils demandent l'appui de l'État et revendiquent du ministère du Tourisme et des Loisirs, qui gère les ressources nécessaires à leurs projets, ce qu'ils considèrent leur revenir de droit. Dans ce champ d'action politique se manifestent les relations de pouvoir entre les organismes franco-ontariens, qui tentent d'assurer le maintien de la communauté franco-ontarienne par le développement des activités physiques et sportives, et le gouvernement provincial, qui contrôle les ressources nécessaires à la réalisation de leur projet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiques→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→