Mechanism of regulation of phosphate dissociation from actomyosin-ADP-Pi by thin filament proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regulation by calcium and myosin-S1 of the acceleration of the rate of phosphate release from myosin-ADP-inorganic phosphate (M-ADP-Pi) by the thin filament actin-tropomyosin (Tm)-troponin (Tn), was measured directly by using double mixing stopped-flow experiments with fluorescent phosphate binding protein. At low calcium and without rigor myosin-S1, saturating concentrations of thin filaments accelerate the rate of phosphate dissociation from M-ADP-Pi 8-fold, from 0.08 to 0.64 s(-1). If either myosin-S1 or calcium is bound to the thin filaments, phosphate release is a biphasic process in which the fast phase is the dissociation of Pi from actoTmTnM-ADP-Pi and the slow phase is limited by the hydrolysis of actoTmTnM-ATP to actoTmTnM-ADP-Pi. The maximum accelerations of the fast components by saturating thin filaments (relative to M-ADP-Pi alone) are: approximately equal 200-fold, 16 s(-1) (calcium only); approximately equal 400-fold, 30 s(-1) (EGTA and rigor S1); and approximately equal1,000-fold, 75 s(-1) (calcium and rigor S1). The maximum rate of phosphate dissociation attained with S1 and calcium bound to the thin filament is the same as for unregulated actin. Regulation of the rate of phosphate dissociation by calcium and myosin-S1 is partially explained by the model of Geeves [McKillop, D. F. and Geeves, M. A. (1993) Biophys. J. 65, 693-701], in which calcium and rigor S1 perturb the equilibria among three states of the thin filament (blocked, closed, and open). However, a quantitative description of the regulatory mechanism requires acceleration by calcium of an additional step of the mechanism, either phosphate dissociation or a preceding conformational change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".