MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972227826 · doi:10.1115/icone10-22776

Non-Linear Fluid-Structure Interaction in Cylindrical Shells

2002· article· en· W1972227826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Volume 1 · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsVibrationFlow (mathematics)Centrifugal forceFluid dynamicsHeat exchangerPhysicsStructural engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuclear plant reliability depends directly on its component performance. The higher heat transfer performance of nuclear plant components often requires higher flow velocities through the shell and tube heat exchangers. So, these cylindrical structures are subjected to either axial or cross flow, while the excessive flow-induced vibrations, (which are a major cause of machinery downtime; fatigue failure and high noise), limit the performance of these structures. On the other hand, these shell components often experience large amplitude vibrations that are greater than the shell thickness. Therefore, the evaluation of complex vibrational behavior of these structures is highly desirable in the nuclear industry. A semi-analytical approach has been developed in the present theory to predict the geometrical non-linearity influence on the natural frequencies of anisotropic cylindrical shells conveying axial flow. Particular important in this study is to obtain the natural frequencies of the coupled system of the fluid-structure, taking into account the geometrical non-linearity of the structure, and also estimating the critical flow velocity at which the structure loses its stability. The displacement functions, mass and stiffness matrices, linear and non-linear ones, of the structure are obtained by exact analytical integration over a hybrid element developed in this work. Linear potential flow theory is applied to describe the fluid effect that leads to the inertial, centrifugal and Coriolis forces. Numerical results are given and compared with those of experiment and other theories to demonstrate the practical application of the present method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it