Electromigration of Chitosan <scp>d</scp>-Glucosamine and Oligomers in Dilute Aqueous Solutions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electromigration behavior of chitosan D-glucosamine and oligomers with a degree of polymerization from 1 to 6 in dilute aqueous systems containing either NaCl or KCl salt at 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 M at pH values from 2 to 9 was evaluated. The results showed that the electromigration of the chitosan D-glucosamine and oligomers did not change by changing the type of salt in the running medium and that the pH had a significant effect on the direction of migration under an external electric field. In addition, the increase in the ionic strength of the medium caused a significant decrease on the absolute value of the electrophoretic mobility, and the highest values of the electromobility were observed in water. However, the ionic strength had no significant effect on the electrophoretic mobilities at pH 2 in comparison with the other pH values. The dimer showed the highest electrophoretic mobility in the alkaline zone of the pH. At pH values lower than the pKa of the D-glucosamine, the chitosan D-glucosamine, and oligomers migrated toward the anode, where the amine groups are protonated and carry positive charge. At higher pH values, chitosan D-glucosamine and oligomers migrated toward the anode, even though they did not carry any electric charge. The contribution of the difference in the dielectric constants between the solvent and the solute to this phenomenon was highlighted. It was shown that the glucose moiety contributes to the direction of migration of the chitosan D-glucosamine and oligomers under alkaline conditions and that the difference in the dielectric constant of glucose and the solvent accounts for the direction and the extent of electromobility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it