THE 2000 MOYER AWARD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relevance of an elevated base deficit (BD) during the fluid resuscitation of a thermally injured patient is not completely understood. After nonthermal trauma, early elevation of the BD represents insufficient cellular perfusion and is ultimately associated with a higher incidence of organ dysfunction and death. However, this relationship has not been completely examined after burn injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine if elevation of the BD during burn resuscitation was associated with potential consequences of malperfusion, such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and multiple organ dysfunction. The records of 72 patients with burn injuries (mean age, 46 +/- 17 years; mean total body surface area burned, 44% +/- 18%) who required fluid resuscitation on admission to an adult regional burn center were analyzed. Patients with a mean BD of less than -6 mmol/L during the first 24 hours were compared with patients with a mean BD of more than -6 mmol/L. Despite adequate resuscitation with good maintenance of urinary output, the patients in the group with a mean BD of less than -6 mmol/L had more florid systemic inflammatory response syndrome (P = .004), had more prevalent acute respiratory distress syndrome (P = .012), and experienced more severe multiple organ dysfunction (P < .001) compared with patients in the group with a mean BD of more than -6 mmol/L. The results suggest that abnormal elevation of the BD after burn injuries represents a malperfusion state, which may not be recognized if only "traditional" parameters, such as UO, are followed. Furthermore, this state appears to be related to the onset of more severe systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".