MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1972241306 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-996

Abstract 996: Metastasis and tumor recurrence from rare SOX9-positive cells in Group 4 medulloblastoma

2014· article· en· W1972241306 on OpenAlexaff
Vasil Savov, Grammatiki Fotaki, Marc Remke, Adrian M. Dubuc, Vijay Ramaswamy, Matko Čančer, Holger Weishaupt, Michael D. Taylor, Fredrik J. Swartling

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaSOX9Cancer researchPopulationMetastasisWnt signaling pathwayBiologyPathologyCancerMedicineInternal medicineTranscription factorGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tumor recurrence is the main cause of death in children with medulloblastoma (MB). MYCN is a marker for poor prognosis which is amplified in SHH and Group 4 but rarely in WNT and Group 3 subgroups of MB. The exact mechanisms for MB relapse are not known but recent findings (Ramaswamy et al. Lancet Oncol., 2013) suggest temporal differences within the four MB subgroups. For instance, SHH tumors recur locally while SHH-independent Group 4 tumors develop distant metastases. In order to study these processes further, we used a previously described transgenic mouse model of MYCN-driven SHH-independent MB (GTML mouse) to recreate the metastatic recurrence of such brain tumors in vivo. We previously showed that the expression of SOX9 transcription factor correlates well with SHH tumors and that only a few scattered SOX9-positive cells are found in SHH-independent GTML tumors similarly to Group 4 human MB. By using a combination of Tet-ON and Tet-OFF inducible systems we managed to target this rare population of SOX9-positive GTML tumor cells in vivo. These cells were able to form a distant recurrence after the tumor bulk in the mice was removed by using dox-inducible oncogene depletion. These relapses showed similar morphology and immunoreactivity of defined MB markers but presented generally higher levels of SOX9 compared to the primary GTML tumors. Additionally, we overexpressed SOX9 in cerebellar stem cells transfected with a mutationally stabilized MYCNT58A and injected them back into the cerebellum of adult mice. Surprisingly, the MB-like tumors that formed migrated and developed in the forebrain in contrast to the cerebellar tumors induced by the same cells transfected with MYCNT58A only. These findings suggest that increased levels of SOX9 drives migration of MYCN-driven MB cells. A similar correlation was found in Group 4 MB patients where isolated metastases had consistently higher SOX9 levels as compared to the corresponding primary tumor. Significance: We have developed a new mouse model for MB recurrence. We show how a rare population of SOX9-positive cells in SHH-independent MB is capable of initiating recurrence after primary tumor removal. The relapsed MB has similar characteristics to the initial tumor but develops at a distant site in the brain, in line with recent data from human tumors. Further characterization of cells with such properties will help to improve our understanding of the mechanisms behind metastatic MB recurrence and to develop treatments against those migrating cell populations. Citation Format: Vasil Savov, Grammatiki Fotaki, Marc Remke, Adrian M. Dubuc, Vijay Ramaswamy, Matko Cancer, Holger Weishaupt, Michael D. Taylor, Fredrik J. Swartling. Metastasis and tumor recurrence from rare SOX9-positive cells in Group 4 medulloblastoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 996. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-996

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→