MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972245572 · doi:10.1159/000091860

Seizure as a Manifestation of Intracranial Hypotension in a Shunted Patient

2006· article· en· W1972245572 on OpenAlexaff
Deepak Agrawal, Felix Durity

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurosurgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntracranial HypotensionShunt (medical)AsymptomaticHydrocephalusShuntingIntracranial pressureAnesthesiaMagnetic resonance imagingCerebrospinal fluidCerebrospinal fluid pressureSurgerySittingCommunicating hydrocephalusRadiologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors describe a child with a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt in place for 5 years who presented with 'postural' seizures (seizures on sitting upright, which resolved on recumbency). On shunt tap, the cerebrospinal fluid was obtained freely, but required gentle aspiration with a syringe in the recumbent position, suggesting very low intracranial pressure. Contrast magnetic resonance imaging showed pachymeningeal enhancement and enlargement of the pituitary gland diagnostic of intracranial hypotension along with well-decompressed ventricles. At the time of revision of the shunt, no evidence of malfunction was found and the valve was changed to one with a higher opening pressure. Following this, she became asymptomatic and seizure free. This case illustrates the fact that following shunting, intracranial hypotension may also predispose to seizures, and should be kept in mind while managing these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric NeurosurgerySame topicNeurosurgical Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207