Effects of dietary energy and protein density on plasma concentrations of leptin and metabolic hormones in dairy heifers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hormonal and metabolic signals that communicate the level of body energy reserves to the reproductive-mammary axis remain undefined in dairy cattle; consequently, our hypothesis was that leptin may fulfill this role. Our objectives were to determine the effects of diets differing in energy and protein density on dry matter intake (DMI), growth traits [body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), back-fat (BF) thickness], and temporal changes in plasma concentrations of leptin, insulin, growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), glucose, and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) in dairy heifers during the pre- and postpubertal periods. In period 1, heifers were randomly allotted (n = 10/diet) at 103 kg of BW to diets for a predicted average daily gain of 1.10 (high, H), 0.80 (medium, M), or 0.50 kg/d (low, L). Five heifers in each of the H and L groups were further studied during period 2, either at 12 mo of age (HA, LA) or at 330 kg of BW (HW, LW). The data provide evidence that 1) DMI (18%), BW (17%), and BF (5%) together explained 40% of the variation in plasma leptin concentrations (r(2) = 0.396); 2) unlike the acute postprandial increase in plasma insulin as a result of increased nutrient density (H 1.42 +/- 0.09, M 1.02 +/- 0.09, L 0.68 +/- 0.11 ng/mL), plasma leptin concentrations did not respond acutely with a distinct postprandial profile; 3) although plasma leptin concentrations increased with age, leptin at puberty did not differ among treatment groups (H 5.63 +/- 2.48, M 4.28 +/- 0.55, L 4.12 +/- 0.72 ng/mL) and there was no evidence of an abrupt transition in prepubertal plasma leptin concentrations; 4) plasma leptin concentrations may not be a critical trigger for puberty in rapidly growing heifers, but are apparently essential for puberty in heifers with normal or restricted growth rates; and 5) plasma concentrations of insulin (H 0.59 +/- 0.07, M 0.43 +/- 0.09, L 0.30 +/- 0.09 ng/mL), IGF-1 (H 151.08 +/- 16.47, L 82.51 +/- 17.47 ng/mL), and glucose (H 81.35 +/- 3.39, M 73.59 +/- 2.34, L 68.25 +/- 3.39 mg/dL) reflected nutrient density, whereas GH (H 1.82 +/- 0.23, L 5.87 +/- 0.45 ng/mL) and NEFA (H 209.54 +/- 50.83, L 234.93 +/- 48.97 microM) were inversely related to the plane of nutrition. Collectively, these data suggest that plasma concentrations of leptin may play a role in long-term regulation of energy reserves and puberty in growing Holstein heifers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".