MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972268065 · doi:10.1353/chl.2013.0020

Anne's World: A New Century of Anne of Green Gables ed. by Irene Gammel and Benjamin Lefebvre (review)

2013· article· en· W1972268065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren's literature · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipHonorArt historyIconCommodificationArgument (complex analysis)SublimeSociologyArtEnvironmental ethicsHistoryPhilosophyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Anne's World: A New Century of Anne of Green Gables ed. by Irene Gammel and Benjamin Lefebvre Anne K. Phillips (bio) Anne's World: A New Century of Anne of Green Gables, edited by Irene Gammel and Benjamin Lefebvre. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2010. Around the world, the 2008 centenary of Anne of Green Gables sparked popular celebrations as well as scholarly conclaves in honor of Montgomery's beloved novel. New assessments of Montgomery's life and work have appeared in response to those events, including Anne's World, a collection of eleven essays written by recognized as well as emerging Montgomery scholars. Co-editors Irene Gammel and Benjamin Lefebvre intend in this volume "to consolidate a vast amount of information, carefully tracing the previous scholarship and signalling extensions; and to establish new points of departure by locating Anne of Green Gables and its production in social, cultural, and historical contexts while also exploring the reception and cultural uses of the novel, thus providing new lines of argument and new domains of study for future research" (8-9). Occasionally the volume might provide more specific overviews of previous scholarship, but it should succeed in inspiring new additions to Montgomery studies. The opening essay, Carole Gerson's "Seven Milestones: How Anne of Green Gables Became a Canadian Icon," touches on issues of "publication, adaptation, reconstruction, commodification, and commemoration" to show how Anne Shirley was transformed "from a fictional character to a national icon and a cultural industry" (19). In an otherwise [End Page 277] productive essay that touches on textual history, film and theatrical adaptations, government investment in the author, her works, and her legacy, international enthusiasm, and more, Gerson occasionally leaves gaps in her summary of previous scholarship. Readers unfamiliar with Sean Somers's discussion of the post-World War II translation of Anne in Japan, for example, would appreciate a few concrete examples of how the translators' choices align Montgomery's work with the "cultural sensibilities of Japanese readers" (Gerson 23). Serving as an apt bookend to Gerson's essay is co-editor Benjamin Lefebvre's "What's in a Name? Towards a Theory of the Anne Brand," the collection's final essay, which extends the volume's attention to adaptation and commodification of Montgomery's works by asking, "How do images of Anne Shirley outside of the novel Anne of Green Gables contribute to or complicate the Anne brand?" (194). Lefebvre traces what Montgomery was and was not able to control in the process of her work's publication, distribution, and adaptation. He also examines the career trajectory of Dawn Paris, the actress who became "Anne Shirley" (literally renaming herself as she appeared in the 1934 film adaptation), concluding that Montgomery's and "Anne Shirley's" "inability to exert control over the name or the identity anticipated the contested ownership of the Anne brand in the twenty-first century" (194). The contributors of many of the essays sandwiched between Gerson's and Lefebvre's contributions also are interested in publication, adaptation, and commodification, particularly as evidenced by international responses to Anne. Gammel joins Andrew O'Malley, Huifeng Hu, and Ranbir K. Banwait in writing "An Enchanting Girl: International Portraits of Anne's Cultural Transfer," noting that although "many prior critics have assumed that people of a certain country may find Anne of Green Gables so appealing precisely because they lack something in their own culture that they find in Anne," on the contrary, "several countries seem to like her because they have found ways to make the protagonist accord with their prior belief systems" (167; original emphasis). Addressing Anne's reception in brief, engaging, but not fully satisfying sections focusing on Iran, China, Japan, and Germany, the authors conclude—with a nod to Carol Singley's assessment of the term—that "adoption itself becomes a metaphor for the cross-cultural homing of Anne, as she is adopted into different familial and cultural structures" (188). Margaret Steffler's "Anne in a 'Globalized' World: Nation, Nostalgia, and Postcolonial Perspectives of Home," uses a postcolonial lens [End Page 278] to examine how Montgomery's novel, especially in its treatment of nature and nostalgia, resonates with a range...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren's literatureSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207