MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972293597 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2014.6865423

Abstracting Single Event Transient characteristics variations due to input patterns and fan-out

2014· article· en· W1972293597 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)CMOSComputer scienceSoft errorElectronic engineeringAbstractionPulse (music)Event (particle physics)Set (abstract data type)Noise (video)Electronic circuitFeature (linguistics)Digital electronicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to shrinking feature sizes and significant reduction in noise margins, as CMOS technologies evolve toward ultra-deep sub-micron, digital circuits have become more susceptible to soft errors. Therefore, researchers have recently reported several approaches to model Single Event Transient (SET) propagation at gate or higher abstraction levels. However, contemporary techniques model only the possibility that SET pulse may be masked electrically, logically, or by time windowing. In this paper, the propagation induced pulse broadening (PIPB) phenomenon is further investigated and a new model which abstracts this phenomenon is proposed. This paper also investigates and abstracts the impact of input patterns and propagation paths on SET pulse width. Through electrical simulations, we validated our analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207