MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972300062

Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP

2002· article· en· W1972300062 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOnline analytical processingData warehouseComputer scienceBusiness intelligenceData scienceDatabaseQuality (philosophy)Data qualityBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research in data warehousing and OLAP has produced important technologies for the design, management and use of information systems for decision support. Much of the interest and success in this area can be attributed to the need for software and tools to improve data management and analysis given the large amounts of information that are being accumulated in corporate as well as scientific databases.However, even though the high maturity of these technologies, new data needs or applications currently run at companies not only demand more capacity, but also new methods, models, techniques or architectures to satisfy these new needs. Some of the hot topics in data warehouses (DWs) include distributed DWs, advanced OLAP for business intelligence, web warehouses, DWs for new applications such as XML documents, stream data, spatial or GIS data or biomedical data. Moreover, there are other aspects very developed in other software areas such as security or quality, which still remain uncovered by current design methods or technologies for DWs.Like the previous successful DOLAP workshops held in conjunction with CIKMs, the eighth edition of the Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (DOLAP'05) aims to synergistically connect the research community and industry practitioners. It provides an international forum where both researchers and practitioners can share their findings in theoretical foundations, current methodologies, and practical experiences. This year, DOLAP'05 will be specially focused on new research directions and emerging application domains in the areas of data warehousing and OLAP.This year, we received papers from 18 different countries distributed over all continents such as The Netherlands, France, Spain, Israel, Korea, USA, Canada and Argentine. We received 31 submissions and, after a careful review, only 12 papers were selected by the Program Committee, making an acceptance rate of 38.7%.These proceedings contain the papers selected for presentation at the workshop. The accepted papers were presented in 5 sessions: (i) querying OLAP databases, (ii) data warehouse models, (iii, iv) data warehouse design, and (v) query processing and view maintenance. A keynote address was given by Jens Lechtenburger on Schema transformations. We hope that these proceedings will serve as a valuable reference for data warehousing and OLAP researchers and practitioners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207