MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972307365 · doi:10.1021/jo3027438

Study of the Endocyclic versus Exocyclic C–O Bond Cleavage Pathways of α- and β-Methyl Furanosides

2013· article· en· W1972307365 on OpenAlexafffund
Olivier St‐Jean, Michel Prévost, Yvan Guindon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsCleavage (geology)StereochemistryChemistryBond cleavageBiologyOrganic chemistryCatalysisPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The activation and ring-opening of methyl furanosides in the four natural sugar scaffolds (ribo, lyxo, arabino, and xylo) efficiently afforded acyclic thioacetals with high S(N)2-like selectivity at the acetal center in the presence of Me2BBr and thiophenol. The stereochemical outcome of these reactions provides important mechanistic insights into the activation pathway of five-membered semicyclic acetals. The thioacetal products should find applications in oligosaccharides synthesis and allow further development of acyclic strategies for the synthesis of novel nucleoside analogues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207