Sistema de informação geográfica como apoio ao levantamento detalhado de solos do Vale dos Vinhedos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente trabalho propõe o emprego de geotécnicas no apoio a um levantamento detalhado de solos, desde a coleta de dados em campo até à delimitação das unidades de solo e, posteriormente, a elaboração de um mapa final. A área de estudo corresponde a uma carta topográfica na escala 1:5.000 do Vale dos Vinhedos, na região da Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. O material utilizado consiste em dados planialtimétricos de um levantamento aerofotogramétrico, receptores GPS (Global Posigioning System) e softwares de SIG (Sistemas de Informação Geográfica). Os softwares de SIG foram utilizados para integrar os dados de campo com as informações cartográficas e para analisar o relevo por meio de um MNT (Modelo Numérico do Terreno). Os resultados mostraram que o método permite a obtenção de um mapa digital georreferenciado, em que as unidades de mapeamento estão fortemente associadas com as fases de relevo, melhorando sua consistência e confiabilidade e facilitando seu uso futuro para outras aplicações.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".