MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1972315382 · doi:10.1086/320244

Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph Echelle Observations of the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 4151: Physical Conditions in the Ultraviolet Absorbers

2001· article· en· W1972315382 on OpenAlexaff
S. B. Kraemer, D. M. Crenshaw, J. B. Hutchings, I. M. George, A. C. Danks, T. R. Gull, M. E. Kaiser, C. H. Nelson, D. Weistrop, G. L. Vieira

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical Observatory
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace Telescope Imaging SpectrographPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxySpectrographIonizationEmission spectrumSpectral lineAstronomyAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyHubble space telescopeOpticsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have examined the physical conditions in intrinsic UV-absorbing gas in the Seyfert galaxy NGC 4151, using echelle spectra obtained with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) on the Hubble Space Telescope on 1999 July 19. We confirm the presence of the kinematic components detected in earlier Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph (GHRS) observations, all of which appear to be outflowing from the nucleus, as well as a new broad absorption feature at a radial velocity of -1680 km s -1 . The UV continuum of NGC 4151 was a factor of about 4 lower than in observations taken over the previous 2 yr, and we argue that the changes in the column density of the low-ionization absorption lines associated with the broad component at -490 km s -1 reflect the decrease in the ionizing flux. Most of the strong absorption lines (e.g., N V, C IV, Si IV, etc.) from this component are saturated but show substantial residual flux in their cores, indicating that the absorber does not fully cover the source of emission. Our interpretation is that the unocculted light is due to scattering by free electrons from an extended region, which reflects continuum, emission lines, and absorption lines. For the first time in such a study, we have been able to constrain the densities for this kinematic component and several others based on the strength of absorption lines from metastable states of C III and Fe II and/or the ratios of ground and fine structure lines of O I, C II, and Si II. We have generated a set of photoionization models that successfully match not only the ionic column densities for each component during the present low-flux state but also those seen in previous high-flux states with the GHRS and STIS, confirming that the absorbers are photoionized and respond to the changes in the continuum flux. Based on the model parameters (ionization parameter and density), we have been able to map the relative radial positions of the absorbers. We find that the absorbing gas decreases in density with distance. Finally, none of the UV absorbers is of sufficiently large column density or high enough ionization state to account for the observed X-ray absorption, while the scatterer is too highly ionized. Hence, the X-ray absorption must arise in a separate component of circumnuclear gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→