Theoretical analysis of coupled diffuse-photon-density and thermal-wave field depth profiles photothermally generated in layered turbid dental structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A coupled diffuse-photon-density and thermal-wave model is developed for theoretical analysis of the photothermal field in demineralized teeth. Intact and demineralized layers of enamel, as well as dentin, are described as a layered one-dimensional system. The solution of the radiative transport equation in the limit of diffuse-photon-density field is considered as a source term in the thermal-wave field equation. The influence of optical parameters (absorption and scattering coefficients) and thermal parameters (thermal diffusivity and conductivity) of each layer on the diffuse-photon-density and thermal-wave depth profiles is analyzed using computer simulations, allowing the verification of accuracy and validity of the developed theory. The proposed model and simulations are intended for identifying the parameters most affecting the diffuse-photon-density and thermal-wave fields in turbid media, which leads to optimization of the fitting process of thermal and optical properties of teeth from experimental data obtained by frequency-domain photothermal radiometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".