Conservation of the function of <i>DMRT1</i> regulatory sequences in mammalian sex differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among genes involved in sex determination and differentiation, DMRT1 is the only one characterized to date containing a domain (the DM domain) that is conserved between phyla. To study DMRT1 transcriptional regulation within mammalian phyla, we generated transgenic mice that express green fluorescent protein (GFP) or Cre-recombinase (Cre) under the control of 2.6 kb of pig DMRT1 5' flanking sequences (pDMRT1p-GFP and pDMRT1p-Cre, respectively). Within the pDMRT1p-GFP positive mice, GFP expression was observed in the XY genital ridge by embryonic day 11.5 (e11.5) and remained detectable during testis embryonic development to birth. GFP expression was restricted within testis cords as soon as cords were detectable. No fluorescence was observed in developing ovaries, although more sensitive RT-PCR analysis revealed transgene expression in embryonic ovaries from e13.5 to e15.5. RT-PCR performed on fluorescent activated cell sorter (FACS)-purified GFP cells from e14.5, e17.5, and e19.5 developing testis showed that GFP expression was restricted to cells expressing the endogenous mouse Dmrt1. GFP cells also expressed Mis and Oct4, showing that the transgene is expressed in both Sertoli cell and germ cell compartments. In postnatal testis, transgene expression was detectable by GFP fluorescence from P0 to P21 in mice heterozygous for the transgene and through adulthood in mice homozygous for the transgene. In pDMRT1p-Cre positive mice, Cre expression was detected within the genital ridges of both XY and XX embryos. We conclude that DMRT1 regulatory mechanisms during sexual differentiation are functionally conserved across mammalian evolution. The transgenic mouse lines described should provide useful marker systems for studies involving Dmrt1 gene expression during sex differentiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".