MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972394415 · doi:10.1117/12.390584

<title>Modeling light reflection from colored filament assemblies</title>

2000· article· en· W1972394415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein filamentOpticsReflection (computer programming)TransmittanceReflectivityRefractive indexRefractionAbsorption (acoustics)RADIUSMaterials scienceColoredPhysicsComposite materialComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The model describes the reflection, refraction and absorption of light rays by a single cylindrical filament according to the classical laws of optics. The overall light transmittance and reflectance of a single filament are then assumed to apply to an entire layer of such filaments. The optical behavior of the entire filament assembly is derived by adding successive filament layers, with the same optical characteristics, to those already present. The model describes the effects of varying the relative refractive index of the filament material and the filament radius on the transmittance and reflectance of the filament matrix, and in individual filaments, influences the perceived color depth. The dye may be evenly distributed throughout each filament or located in a ring close to the filament periphery. The model also considers the case where filaments near the surface of the assembly are colored while those in the interior are not. The results are discussed in relation to practical coloration experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it