MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972396697 · doi:10.1055/s-2002-19993

Sex steroids regulate TSH-induced thyroid growth during sexual maturation in Wistar rats

2002· article· en· W1972396697 on OpenAlexaff
K. Banu, M. M. Aruldhas

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineThyroidHormoneTestosterone (patch)MedicineEstrogenBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sex steroids have been reported to influence thyroid pathogenesis in human and experimental animals. However, there is no much report on the effect of sex steroids in the growth of normal thyroid. The present study is an attempt to know TSH-induced thyroid growth during sexual maturation in Wistar rats. Wistar rats of day 1 to day 150 postpartum (pp) were used in the present study. Thyroid growth indices such as absolute and relative thyroid weights, concentration of DNA in the thyroid, mitotic index and numerical density of thyrocytes, hormonal profiles in the serum and thyroid tissue such as thyrotropin (TSH), thyroid hormones, testosterone and estradiol, and receptors for TSH, androgen and estrogen in the thyroid were estimated. A gender-specific shift in the pattern of serum TSH and TSH-R was observed during 30-45 days of postnatal life, the period at which steroidogenesis by testes or ovaries of rats are reactivated. Testosterone in males and estradiol in females modulate thyroid growth through TSH. It is concluded from the present study that changes in the sex steroid status between male and female rats have a definite influence on the pattern of thyroid growth and TSH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental and Clinical Endocrinology & DiabetesSame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207