Elastosis perforans serpiginosa Associated with Pseudo-Pseudoxanthoma elasticum during Treatment of Wilson’s Disease with Penicillamine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elastosis perforans serpiginosa (EPS) is a reactive perforating dermatosis characterized by the elimination of abnormal elastic fibers from the upper dermis through the epidermis. In a few cases, it occurs as a side effect of treatment by D-penicillamine (DPA). The first case of EPS induced by DPA was described in 1972 in a patient treated for Wilson's disease. Subsequently, cutaneous changes resembling pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) were observed in patients treated with DPA and were reported as pseudo-PXE. CASE REPORT: We report herein the clinical, pathological and ultrastructural study of 2 new cases of DPA-induced EPS and pseudo-PXE. These patients had been treated for Wilson's disease since 14 and 16 years, respectively. Characteristic abnormal elastic fibers were found on histopathological examination of both EPS and pseudo-PXE skin and confirmed by an ultrastructural study. There was no ABCC6 mutation. DISCUSSION: Penicillamine is able to induce widespread, cutaneous and systemic, elastic fiber damage. Our patients present typical features of DPA-induced elastosis, presenting as EPS and pseudo-PXE. ABCC6 mutation is associated with PXE and, as expected, it was absent in our cases of pseudo-PXE. This elastopathy has been related to morphologic changes in elastic fibers secondary to prolonged therapy in most cases. DPA may interfere with elastin cross-linking through inhibition of the enzyme lysyl oxidase, or by formation of complexes with the cross-linked precursors, impairing a normal maturation of elastic fibers. However, no fatal complication of DPA-induced elastopathy has been reported so far. An improvement of the cutaneous lesions is expected after the drug discontinuation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".