MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972449237 · doi:10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.344

Nontarget Herbivory by a Weed Biocontrol Insect is Limited to Spillover

2015· article· en· W1972449237 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haley A. Catton, Robert G. Lalonde, Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Ecological Society of America · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeevilCruciferWeedBiologyBiological pest controlHerbivoreAgronomyEcologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The biocontrol weevil Mogulones crucifer, released in Canada since 1997 but not approved in the USA, is known to sporadically use native nontarget relatives of its target weed for feeding, oviposition, and larval development. Catton et al. released M. crucifer in outbreak densities in patches of mixed target and nontarget plants and nontarget plants in isolation from the target weed to determine if this nontarget herbivory is a spillover effect, or if the weevil establishes and sustains populations on the native plant. A Mogulones crucifer weevil feeds on a developing flowering stem of the native nontarget plant Hackelia micrantha eight days after a biocontrol release in Canada. Photo by Haley A. Catton. The photograph illustrates the article “Nontarget herbivory by a weed biocontrol insect is limited to spillover, reducing the chance of population-level impacts” by Haley A. Catton, Robert G. Lalonde, and Rosemarie A. De Clerck-Floate, published in Ecological Applications 25(2):517–530, March 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/14-0250.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Ecological Society of AmericaSame topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207