MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1972459469 · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-331850

Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia presenting with pancytopenia

2012· article· en· W1972459469 on OpenAlexaff
Cyrus C. Hsia, Alejandro Lazo‐Langner

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPancytopeniaMedicinePopulationBone marrowLeukemiaPathologyAcute leukemiaCytarabineCD33ImmunologyBasophilicMyeloidGastroenterologyBiologyCD34Genetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 55-year-old woman being worked up for possible bladder prolapse was found to have pancytopenia. She had no prior history of malignancies or exposure to chemotherapy or radiation. Her CBC showed WBC 1.0 10 9 /L, neutrophils 0.14 10 9 /L, hemoglobin 99 g/L, MCV 100 fL, and platelet count 61 10 9 /L. A peripheral blood smear confirmed the pancytopenia and bone marrow aspirate revealed numerous medium to large monomorphic blast cells (40%) with basophilic cytoplasm containing vacuoles (panel A). Several of these blast cells had an immature folded-in nucleus with nucleoli and vacuolation (panel B). Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated a population of cells positive for CD34, CD117, CD13, CD33, human leukocyte Ag-DR, CD15, and MPO positive consistent with a myeloblast population. Cytogenetic studies revealed a complex karyotype with the presence of trisomies 8 and 21 and deletion 17p. The patient was admitted to the hospital and started on standard induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→