Energetic protons generated by ultrahigh contrast laser pulses interacting with ultrathin targets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A regime of laser acceleration of protons, which relies on the interaction of ultrahigh contrast laser pulses with ultrathin targets, has been validated using experiments and simulations. Proton beams were accelerated to a maximum energy of ∼7.3MeV from targets as thin as 30nm irradiated at 1018Wcm−2μm2 (1J, 320fs) with an estimated peak laser pulse to pedestal intensity contrast ratio of 1011. This represents nearly a tenfold increase in proton energy compared to the highest energies obtainable using non contrast enhanced pulses and thicker targets (>5μm) at the same intensity. To obtain similar proton energy with thicker targets and the same laser pulse duration, a much higher laser intensity (i.e., above 1019Wcm−2μm2) is required. The simulations are in close agreement with the experimental results, showing efficient electron heating compared to the case of thicker targets. Rapid target expansion, allowing laser absorption in density gradients, is key to enhanced electron heating and ion acceleration in ultrathin targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".