MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972505369 · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/30/6/s04

A multi-frequency EIT system design based on telecommunication signal processors

2009· article· en· W1972505369 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicolas Robitaille, R. Guardo, Isabelle Maurice, Alzbeta E. Hartinger, Hervé Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Measurement · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsElectrical impedance tomographyMicrocontrollerElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringAcousticsSIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringComputer scienceElectrical impedancePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography system for cardiopulmonary monitoring has been designed with specialized digital signal processors developed primarily for the telecommunications sector. The system consists of two modules: a scan-head and a base-station. The scan-head, located close to the patient's torso, contains front-end circuits for measuring transfer impedance with a 16-electrode array. The base-station, placed at the bedside, comprises 16 direct digital synthesizers, 32 digital down-converters, digital circuits to control the data acquisition sequence and a USB-2.0 microcontroller. At every step of the scan sequence, the system simultaneously measures four complex variables at eight frequencies. These variables are the potential difference between the selected pair of sense electrodes, the currents applied by the source and sink electrodes, and the current flowing through the ground electrode. Frequencies are programmable from 10 kHz to 2 MHz with a resolution of 2 mHz. Characterization tests were performed with a precision mesh phantom connected to the scan-head. For a 5 Hz frame rate, the mean signal-to-noise ratio and accuracy are, respectively, 43 dB and 95.4% for eight frequencies logarithmically spaced from 70 to 950 kHz. In vitro and in vivo time-difference images have been reconstructed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiological MeasurementSame topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207