MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nernst and Seebeck Coefficients of the Cuprate Superconductor<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>YBa</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Cu</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>6.67</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>: A Study of Fermi Surface Reconstruction

2010· article· lv· W1972513448 on OpenAlexaff
J. Chang, Ramzy Daou, Cyril Proust, D. LeBoeuf, Nicolas Doiron-Leyraud, F. Laliberté, Benjamin Pingault, B. J. Ramshaw, Ruixing Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, H. Takagi, Ana Antunes, I. Sheikin, Kamran Behnia, Louis Taillefer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsNernst effectCuprateSeebeck coefficientSuperconductivityNernst equationPhysicsFermi surfaceDopingMaterials scienceElectrical resistivity and conductivityQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Seebeck and Nernst coefficients $S$ and $\ensuremath{\nu}$ of the cuprate superconductor ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{y}$ (YBCO) were measured in a single crystal with doping $p=0.12$ in magnetic fields up to $H=28\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{T}$. Down to $T=9\text{ }\mathrm{K}$, $\ensuremath{\nu}$ becomes independent of field by $H\ensuremath{\simeq}30\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{T}$, showing that superconducting fluctuations have become negligible. In this field-induced normal state, $S/T$ and $\ensuremath{\nu}/T$ are both large and negative in the $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ limit, with the magnitude and sign of $S/T$ consistent with the small electronlike Fermi surface pocket detected previously by quantum oscillations and the Hall effect. The change of sign in $S(T)$ at $T\ensuremath{\simeq}50\text{ }\mathrm{K}$ is remarkably similar to that observed in ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{x}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$, ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x\ensuremath{-}y}{\mathrm{Nd}}_{y}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$, and ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x\ensuremath{-}y}{\mathrm{Eu}}_{y}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$, where it is clearly associated with the onset of stripe order. We propose that a similar density-wave mechanism causes the Fermi surface reconstruction in YBCO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1340.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207