Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Literature Survey on Recent Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a symptom of cochlear injury. It is characterized by sudden onset, and, within a few hours, it reaches its maximum peak. It may be accompanied by vertigo and tinnitus. Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain its etiology: viral inflammation, vascular diseases, allergic reaction, rupture of intralabyrinthine membranes, and autoimmune diseases. The decrease in hearing may be unilateral or bilateral. To assess the histopathology of the labyrinth in cases of SSHL and to provide a better understanding of the etiopathogenesis, many studies have been carried out. Atrophy of the organ of Corti, loss of cochlear neurons, labyrinthine fibrosis, formation of new bone, and degeneration of the spiral ligament, vascular stria, hairy cells, dendrites, and apical spiral ganglion cells have been reported in temporal bone studies. In this article, new studies on the histopathologic and therapeutic bases of SSHL are reviewed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".