MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972523055 · doi:10.1089/ten.2004.10.1323

Long-Term Intermittent Compressive Stimulation Improves the Composition and Mechanical Properties of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage

2004· article· en· W1972523055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartilageChondrocyteStimulationExtracellular matrixChemistryTissue engineeringProteoglycanBiomedical engineeringIn vitroMatrix (chemical analysis)BiophysicsAutologous chondrocyte implantationOsteoarthritisAnatomyArticular cartilageBiochemistryEndocrinologyMedicinePathologyBiologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tissue engineering of articular cartilage is a promising alternative for cartilage repair. However, it has been difficult to develop tissue in vitro that mimicks native cartilage. Cartilaginous tissue formed in vitro does not accumulate enough extracellular matrix, is deficient in collagen, and possesses only a fraction of the mechanical properties of native cartilage. In this study, we investigated whether long-term intermittent compressive stimulation would improve the quality of the generated tissue. Chondrocyte cultures were established on the surface of porous calcium polyphosphate substrates and allowed to form cartilaginous tissue. In vitro-formed tissues were subjected to different stimulation protocols for 1 week. The optimal mechanical stimulation parameters identified in this short-term study were then applied to the cultures for up to 4 weeks. Mechanical stimulation applied at a 5% compressive amplitude at a frequency of 1 Hz for 400 cycles every second day resulted in the greatest increase in collagen synthesis (37 +/- 9% over control) while not significantly affecting proteoglycan synthesis (2 +/- 8% over control). This condition, applied to the chondrocyte cultures for 4 weeks, resulted in a significant increase in the amount of tissue that formed (stimulated, 2.4 +/- 0.2 mg dry wt; unstimulated, 1.61 +/- 0.08 mg dry wt). Stimulated tissues contained approximately 40% more collagen (stimulated, 590 +/- 58 microg; unstimulated, 420 +/- 42 microg), and 30% more proteoglycans (stimulated, 393 +/- 34 microg; unstimulated, 302 +/- 32 microg) as well as displaying a 2- to 3-fold increase in compressive mechanical properties (maximal equilibrium stress: stimulated, 10 +/- 1 kPa; unstimulated, 5 +/- 1 kPa; maximal equilibrium modulus: stimulated, 80 +/- 23 kPa; unstimulated, 24 +/- 6 kPa). The results of this study demonstrate that intermittent mechanical stimulation can increase collagen synthesis and, when applied over a 4-week period, can accelerate extracellular matrix accumulation as well as improve the material properties of the developed tissue. Interestingly, only short periods of mechanical stimulation (6 min every second day) were needed to affect the quality of cartilaginous tissue formed in vitro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it