The Induction of Low Nocturnal Secretion of Melatonin Caused by Reverse Feeding Rhythms Depends on Availability of Macronutrient Diets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study investigated the effect of single chow diet and two-way dietary choice between a protein-rich and a carbohydrate-rich diet ingested during free access or daytime access (08.00-16.00 h) on the rhythms of ingestion and on nocturnal levels of serum melatonin and pineal N-acetyltransferase activity in rats. Animals with free access to the single or the choice diets displayed a circadian rhythmicity of total food intake with peaks at the beginning, the middle and the end of the dark phase. Rats fed the dietary choice displayed a preference for carbohydrate at the beginning, and a preference for protein at the middle and the end of the dark phase. Under daytime feeding access, both dietary conditions resulted in only one peak of total intake at the beginning of the access period. Rats fed the choice diets on the daytime feeding schedule initially preferred carbohydrate to protein but this preference disappeared subsequently. Nocturnal peaks of serum melatonin and pineal NAT activity were lower with daytime access to dietary choice compared to ad libitum access. The results suggest that in a two-way selection of macronutrients, feeding cycle can directly act on the rhythms expressed within the pineal gland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".