MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972542771 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.771

Integrating Carbon Capture and Storage with Energy Production from Saline Aquifers: A Strategy to Offset the Energy Cost of CCS

2014· article· en· W1972542771 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Ganjdanesh, Steven L. Bryant, Gary A. Pope, Kamy Sepehrnoori

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersBasic Energy SciencesUniversity of Texas at AustinEnergy Frontier Research CentersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceCarbon capture and storage (timeline)Carbon sequestrationAquiferMethaneGeothermal gradientBrineCarbon dioxideElectricity generationOffset (computer science)Waste managementEnergy storagePetroleum engineeringEnvironmental engineeringGeologyEngineeringChemistryGroundwaterClimate changePower (physics)Geotechnical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extraction of brine containing methane and geothermal energy from saline aquifers has been considered as a method to offset the cost of carbon capture and storage. This study estimates the potential of power generation from methane and heat and compares it with the power required for capture and storage. Nine aquifer models were prepared from average conditions of several wells in the Gulf Coast at depths from 8,000 to 16,000 ft. Reservoir simulation study was performed to estimate the amounts of stored carbon dioxide and produced methane and heat. The study found that the power generation potential from below the depth of 11,000 ft offsets the power required for capture and storage processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207