MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972563587 · doi:10.1109/eumc.2005.1608945

An integrated 6.2-11GHz SiGe inductorless injection locked frequency divider

2005· article· en· W1972563587 on OpenAlexafffund
J.K. Nakaska, J.W. Haslett

Bibliographic record

Venue2005 European Microwave Conference · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFrequency dividerColpitts oscillatorPhase noisedBcElectrical engineeringPhase-locked loopFrequency multiplierHeterojunction bipolar transistorElectronic engineeringEngineeringTransistorMaterials scienceCMOSVoltageLocal oscillatorBipolar junction transistorVackář oscillator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency synthesis in modern wireless transceivers requires high frequency, and for many circuit architectures, increased tuning range. In this work, a novel large-tuning range injection locked RF division integrated circuit is presented. The fabricated design operates from 6.2 GHz to 11 GHz. A benchmark Colpitts divider was fabricated on the same silicon. At a 10 kHz offset from the carrier, the inductorless divider has a measured phase noise of -112 dBc/Hz and consumes 17.5 mW from a 3.3 V supply, whereas the Colpitts divider has a measured phase noise of -107 dBc/Hz and consumes 11.7 mW from a 3 V supply. The new architecture also reduces the dependence on quality factor of integrated components for LC-resonant structures by utilizing transistor and layout parasitics at the frequencies of interest. The new inductorless injection locked divider has a very flat output power characteristic over the division range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2005 European Microwave ConferenceSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207