MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972599392 · doi:10.1002/jnr.10683

Unusual topographical pattern of proximal astrogliosis around a cortical devascularizing lesion

2003· article· en· W1972599392 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Wang, Wolfgang Walz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlial fibrillary acidic proteinLesionAstrogliosisGliosisPathologyVimentinGFAP stainAstrocyteAnatomyBiologyGlial scarMedicineNeuroscienceCentral nervous systemImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Class II vessels were disrupted on the cortical surface of adult rats within a circular 5-mm-diameter area. This consistently resulted in the formation of a conical lesion by day 1, with a cystic cavity forming by day 21. Four markers were used to identify the glial response surrounding the lesion. The antibody used against S100beta marked the largest astrocytic pool in the gray matter of the cerebral cortex; only approximately 5% of astrocytes were glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)(+) in control animals. GFAP served as a marker for distal reactive gliosis and vimentin (VIM) for proximal gliosis. Isolectin B4 was used as an additional marker to distinguish VIM(+) microglia from astrocytes inside the lesion area. Three immunohistochemically distinct areas of reactive astrocytes surrounding the lesion were found within 24 hr of injury and lasted through day 6. The first area, in contrast to focal traumatic injuries, consisted of a 196-microm-thick boundary layer of S100beta(+) cells immediately surrounding the lesion that never expressed GFAP or VIM by day 6. This boundary layer turns into a GFAP(+) glial limitans encasing the cystic cavity by day 21. A second unusual extended area around the base of the lesion reaching partly into the corpus callosum consisted of S100beta(+)/GFAP(+)/VIM(+) cells. This region appears to be compatible with the local or proximal gliotic response usually found completely surrounding other focal-type injuries. The proximal response at the base of the lesion developed over the first 3 days in the following sequence: S100beta(+)/GFAP(-)/VIM(-) to S100beta(+)/GFAP(+)/VIM(-) to S100beta(+)/GFAP(+)/VIM(+). Ninety percent of the astrocytes in this area express VIM. This is very high compared with findings in stab-wound preparations, where only 10% of astrocytes (surrounding entire lesion) are found to be VIM(+). A third region, consistent with a remote or distal reactive gliotic response, demonstrated staining for S100beta and had increased GFAP contents throughout the neocortical hemisphere. Cells in this region were never found to be VIM(+). Among S100beta(+) cells close to the boundary region, more than 80% expressed detectable GFAP by 2 days after lesioning. S100beta(+) cells 1 mm more laterally (distal to lesion) did not express GFAP to the same level until day 6. Thus, we find three immunohistochemically distinct populations of reactive astrocytes surrounding the focal ischemic lesion. In contrast to the case for stab-wound traumatic injury, the response closest to and surrounding the lesion did not up-regulate GFAP or VIM by day 6. The proximal response was, instead, more remote and only at the base of the lesion, extending partly into the corpus callosum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience ResearchSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207