Branch Plate-to-Circular Hollow Structural SectionConnections. I: Experimental Investigation and Finite-Element Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although branch plate-to-circular hollow section (CHS) connections under branch axial load are simple to fabricate and cost-effective, they generally experience significant deformation at relatively low loads resulting in an imposed deformation limit. To increase the connection capacity, various stiffening methods such as use of ring stiffeners, grout filling, and “through plate” connections have been proposed. To determine the effectiveness of previously unstudied plate-to-CHS through plate connections, an experimental investigation consisting of 12 connections was undertaken. Additionally, the behavior of nonorthogonal or skewed connections and the effect of load sense were examined. The experimental study determined that through plate-to-CHS connection behavior can be obtained by algebraically combining the behavior of a T-type branch plate-to-CHS connection in tension with another in compression. Moreover, the through plate connection increased the capacity by more than three times that of a branch plate connection loaded in compression. Finite-element (FE) models were constructed to replicate, and be compared with, the experimental connections to validate the use of FE modeling for a subsequent parametric study with the aim of expanding the scope of the experimental results database.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".