Blockade of Neurotensin Binding in the Rat Hypothalamus and of the Central Action of Neurotensin on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis with Non-Peptide Receptor Antagonists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central administration of neurotensin (NT) has been shown to activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, an effect which seems dependent upon the release of corticotropin-releasing factor. In this study, we describe the distribution of NT binding sites in the hypothalamus using film and emulsion receptor autoradiography. Among the 125I-NT-labelled hypothalamic nuclei, relatively high densities of neurotensin binding sites were detected over the paraventricular nucleus. Silver grains on emulsion-coated slides overlaid indiscriminately cell bodies and surrounding processes of magnocellular and parvocellular parts of the nucleus. Two newly developed NT receptor antagonists, SR 48692 and its analog SR 48450, competed for 125I-NT binding to hypothalamic tissue sections and membrane preparations with Ki values in the nanomolar range. Moreover, intracerebrally injected SR 48450 was able to block the NT-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation in freely moving rats, whereas its administration alone did not significantly affect basal plasma levels of adrenocorticotropin and corticosterone. These data provide anatomical substrate for a potential neurotensin action at the hypothalamus in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation and highlight the use of new non-peptide NT receptor antagonists to characterize the effects of NT on neuroendrocrine functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".