DETERMINING THE RELATIVE TOXICITY AND RBE OF INTERNAL EMITTERS IN ANIMALS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is almost impossible to conduct a perfect study of the relative toxicity of the radiations produced by different radionuclides. This is because the results of such studies are commonly confounded by spatial and temporal differences in the distributions of dose produced by the radionuclides employed. In addition, the results of a study designed to overcome these problems (using matched radionuclides incorporated within fused clay particles) revealed additional characteristics of an ideal study. These included the use of sufficient numbers of animals to give the study statistical power; the derivation of all causes of death and of survival for the analysis; the use of relative risk, rather than crude incidence data, to determine toxicity ratios; the cautious use of relative biological effectiveness values derived from fitted curves; and the preferred use of relative toxicity values derived directly from the data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it