The effect of 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) and cycloheximide (CHX) on the development and chromosomal complement of sheep parthenogenetic and nuclear transfer embryos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of activation by 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) and cycloheximide (CHX) on the development and chromosomal complement of sheep parthenogenetic and SCNT embryos were investigated. The results revealed that the blastocyst development of parthenogenetic embryos was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in 6-DMAP activated oocytes, compared to those activated with CHX (21.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 14.9 +/- 0.5, respectively). In contrast, the blastocyst frequencies did not significantly differ (P > 0.05) between the two activation treatment groups for SCNT embryos. The 6-DMAP or CHX treatment did not result in any significant difference in the blastocyst total cell number in either parthenote or SCNT embryos. The chromosomal analysis revealed that all the parthenogenetic embryos (100.0%) derived from 6-DMAP treatment, were chromosomally abnormal whereas in CHX-treated embryos, it was significantly lowered (93.6%, P < 0.05). Conversely, the proportions of chromosomally abnormal SCNT embryos did not significantly differ (P > 0.05) among the 6-DMAP and CHX- treated embryo groups (60.0% vs. 56.2%, respectively). This study demonstrated that oocyte activation agents such as DMAP and CHX have differing effects on meiotic or mitotic nuclei. The study also highlighted the feasibility of using bovine X and Y chromosome specific painting probes in sheep embryos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it