MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972631971 · doi:10.1159/000186133

Effect of Drug Additives to Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions on the Viability and Function of Mouse Peritoneal Cells

2008· article· en· W1972631971 on OpenAlexaff
Raymonde F. Gagnon, Gregory Obst, Geoffrey K. Richards, Florence Gervais

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeritoneal dialysisMedicineCytotoxicityDrugPharmacologyPeritoneumCytotoxic T cellHydrogen peroxideInternal medicinePathologyBiochemistryIn vitroBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions and therapeutic drugs frequently added to PD solutions in clinical practice have been shown to reduce the viability and to impair the function of mouse peritoneal cells. The cytotoxicity of PD solutions, directly related to the dextrose concentration, was more marked towards resident than elicited peritoneal cells. None of the drug additives, heparin and insulin amongst them, were cytotoxic when tested alone or combined with 4.25% PD solution, with the exception of phosphatidylcholine which markedly enhanced the cytotoxicity of the PD solution. While the function of mouse peritoneal macrophages as measured by their hydrogen peroxide production was largely unaffected by PD solutions and drug additives when tested separately, the combination of 4.25% PD solution with any of the drug additives resulted in complete abolition of macrophage respiratory burst. The results should caution against the indiscriminate addition of drugs to PD solutions in dialysis patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207