MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1972653050 · doi:10.7202/201217ar

D’une lucidité, d’une ironie et d’une tendresse

2006· article· fr· W1972653050 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michel van Schendel

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La relation des circonstances d'une amitié rend hommage à l'action multiforme d'un homme, Gilles Hénault, très engagé, sa vie durant, aux frontières nouvelles de la revendication syndicale, de l'art, de la direction artistique, de l'édition, du journalisme, de la poésie qui les transmue. L'examen de plusieurs poèmes tente de vérifier, par confrontation au texte, la valeur du témoignage. C'est ainsi que la distanciation et une façon neuve d'aborder les problèmes de /'indifférence trouvent gîte et forme dans l'accueil que Hénault réserve à la poésie chinoise, dans la réflexion qu'il instaure à partir de là et dans la mutation de sa poésie. Un art poétique, celui de " Bestiaire ", l'annonçait déjà.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.028
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et Images→Same topicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts→French-language works237,207→