MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972667212 · doi:10.1177/0261927x08330520

Complex Health Communication

2009· article· en· W1972667212 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liz Jones, Bernadette Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Language and Social Psychology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth communicationDilemmaPsychological interventionKey (lock)Association (psychology)Public relationsPsychologyRisk communicationPolitical scienceSociologyEngineering ethicsMedicineEpistemologyEnvironmental healthComputer sciencePsychiatryPsychotherapistComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The articles presented in this special issue represent key issues for current day health communication scholars. The articles were commissioned by the International Association of Language and Social Psychology Taskforce and presented at the 2008 International Communication Association in Montreal. Each article tackles a specific health dilemma and demonstrates the need for immediate but theoretically based interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Language and Social PsychologySame topicDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207